Claims

Blended learning professional development produces significantly higher gain means in ICT knowledge (TK, TPK, TCK, TPACK) than traditional training for in-service science teachers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental (blended learning) group showed significantly higher gain means than the control (traditional) group on all four ICT knowledge dimensions (TK, TPK, TCK, TPACK). → Qasem & Viswanathappa 2016

Evidence

Qasem & Viswanathappa 2016

Qasem, A. A. A., & Viswanathappa, G. (2016). Blended Learning Approach to Develop the Teachers' TPACK. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(3), 264-276. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6176

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pretest-posttest non-equivalent groups study of 60 in-service science teachers (30 per group) in Ibb, Yemen. T-test on gain means found the blended group's TK gain (M=26.167) significantly exceeded the control group's (M=22.1), with "significant difference (t=3.068, p< 0.05)"; the same held for TPK (M=29.00 vs 22.70, t=5.404), TCK (M=23.93 vs 20.57, t=3.141) and TPACK (M=15.77 vs 12.83, t=3.030), each p < 0.05. No effect size is printed.

"Table 4 reveals a significant difference (t=3.068, p< 0.05) on gain mean of TK, and the gain mean score in TK is higher in the experimental group (M=26.167) when compared to the control group (M=22.1)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.