Claims

Both blended and traditionally trained teacher groups improved significantly on all four TPACK-based ICT knowledge dimensions from pretest to posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Within both the experimental and control groups, posttest scores were significantly higher than pretest scores on TK, TPK, TCK, and TPACK. → Qasem & Viswanathappa 2016

Evidence

Qasem & Viswanathappa 2016

Qasem, A. A. A., & Viswanathappa, G. (2016). Blended Learning Approach to Develop the Teachers' TPACK. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(3), 264-276. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6176

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired pre-post t-tests within each group of 30 teachers showed significant improvement on all four ICT knowledge dimensions in both training conditions; for example the experimental TK mean rose from 9.50 to 35.67 (t=35.222, df=29, p=.000).

"Table 3 indicates that there are significant differences between mean scores on pretest and posttest at 0.05 level of confidence on ICT Knowledge (TK, TPK, TCK, and TPACK)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.