Claims

Blog-based writing showed higher reflection levels and was substantially shorter than end-of-semester papers in one experimental study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pre-service teachers who used blogs showed higher levels of reflection than those who wrote papers, and blog writing averaged 1,108 words shorter (a 35.0% reduction) than end-of-semester papers. → Carlos R. del Blanco 2018

Evidence

Carlos R. del Blanco 2018

Carlos R. del Blanco, Ivan García-Magariño. (2018). The use of blogs in the education field: A qualitative systematic review. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.05421

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review reports Harland & Wondra's experimental study with 67 pre-service teachers in a curriculum and instruction course, treatment group blogging about classroom observations versus control writing reflective papers. The review states blog users "showed higher levels of reflection in comparison wit h those students who had written papers".

"The study found that the writing of pre-service teachers who had used blogs showed higher levels of reflection in comparison wit h those students who had written papers. In addition, the study did not find any relationship between the depth of reflection and the peer/inst ructor feed- back."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.