Claims

Experimental studies found no significant increase in students' knowledge from blogging in three separate studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Three experimental studies (Hungerford-Kresser et al., Papastergiou et al., Hsu & Wang) reported no significant increase in students' knowledge or learning from blogging. → Carlos R. del Blanco 2018

Evidence

Carlos R. del Blanco 2018

Carlos R. del Blanco, Ivan García-Magariño. (2018). The use of blogs in the education field: A qualitative systematic review. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.05421

q2 · i? · review · r2

Review synthesis of experimental-design studies. The review reports "Three studies reported no s ignificant increase in students’ knowledge or leaning", beginning with Hungerford-Kresser et al.'s survey of 120 pre-service teachers with treatment and control groups.

"Three studies reported no s ignificant increase in students’ knowledge or leaning. Hungerford-Kresser et al. (2012) surveyed 120 pre-service teachers to explore the effects of blog ging on fa- cilitating classroom communities of practice in content-area literacy courses."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.