Most Blueprint students reported strong tutor relationships, but reported relationship strength varied across sites¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Most students reported strong relationships with their tutors, yet the reported strength of student-tutor relationships varied across tutoring sites. → Andrew Gothro 2023
Evidence¶
Andrew Gothro 2023¶
Andrew Gothro, Gregory Chojnacki. (2023). Blueprint Math Fellows Tutoring Program: Math Knowledge Impacts and Participant Math Perceptions. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/math-knowledge-impacts-and-math-perceptions-among-participants-in-the-blueprint-math-fellows
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Participant survey findings from the evaluation report: "most students reported strong relationships with their tutors". The key findings section adds that reported relationship strength "varied across sites". No effect size is printed for this measure.
"In addition, most students reported strong relationships with their tutors, and on average, students' reported math confidence and belonging in tutoring increased modestly during the school year."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Exploratory analyses: students ending the year in larger tutoring groups showed the largest math score increases but reported weaker tutor relationships than peers in smaller groups — related
- Student math confidence and sense of belonging in tutoring increased modestly during the school year, with site-level variation — related
- Strong student–tutor relationships and a sense of belonging characterized tutoring programs with high attendance and positive learning effects — a broader claim this one bears on
- Blueprint Math Fellows tutoring raised middle school students' math test scores by 0.12 standard deviations relative to nonparticipant peers — related
- Tutored students reported positive relationships with Cignition tutors, with little variation in relationship quality across tutors — related
- Students completing the end-of-year survey reported favorable views of their relationships with math tutors and their sense of belonging in tutoring sessions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
blueprint-tutor-relationships-varied-by-site |
title |
Most Blueprint students reported strong tutor relationships, but reported relationship strength varied across sites |
description |
Most Blueprint students reported strong tutor relationships, but reported relationship strength varied across sites |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — andrew-gothro-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.