Book-cover recognition predicts vocabulary and letter knowledge even after controlling for intelligence and cognitive control¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Book-cover recognition remained a significant, albeit weaker, vocabulary predictor (β = .22) after entering child cognitive measures. → Davidse 2010
q3 i? Book-cover recognition accounted for 5.29% of letter-knowledge variance in the final model. → Davidse 2010 (2)
Evidence¶
Davidse 2010¶
Davidse, N. J., de Jong, M. T., Bus, A. G., Huijbregts, S. C. J., & Swaab, H. (2010). Cognitive and environmental predictors of early literacy skills. Read Writ 24, 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9233-3
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Model 3 of the vocabulary regression (N = 174): book-cover recognition remained significant (β = .22) after SON subtests and cognitive control measures were entered.
"the book-cover recognition test continued to be a significant, albeit weaker, predictor (b = .22). SON categories accounted for about 4% of the variance, and memory accounted for an additional 4.84%."
Davidse 2010 (2)¶
Davidse, N. J., de Jong, M. T., Bus, A. G., Huijbregts, S. C. J., & Swaab, H. (2010). Cognitive and environmental predictors of early literacy skills. Read Writ 24, 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9233-3
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Model 3 of the letter-knowledge regression (N = 174): book-cover recognition remained significant, accounting for "5.29% of the variance"; SON patterns added 4.41%.
"the book-cover test continued to be significant. It accounted for 5.29% of the variance. SON patterns accounted for 4.41% of the total variance."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Book exposure predicts letter knowledge (about 6% of variance), consistent with meta-analytic evidence that print-related skills improve even from story-content-focused reading
- Children's storybook knowledge (book-cover recognition) mediates the relationship between home literacy environment and literacy outcomes — related
- Cognitive control mechanisms do not moderate the beneficial effects of book exposure on early literacy outcomes — related
- Short-term memory predicts vocabulary over and above book exposure and intelligence — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
book-cover-recognition-predicts-literacy-beyond-intelligence |
title |
Book-cover recognition predicts vocabulary and letter knowledge even after controlling for intelligence and cognitive control |
description |
Book-cover recognition predicts vocabulary and letter knowledge even after controlling for intelligence and cognitive control |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — davidse-2010, davidse-2010-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.