Claims

Cognitive control mechanisms do not moderate the beneficial effects of book exposure on early literacy outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Interaction terms between book-cover recognition and dummy-coded cognitive control variables did not improve model fit for vocabulary or letter knowledge. → Davidse 2010

Evidence

Davidse 2010

Davidse, N. J., de Jong, M. T., Bus, A. G., Huijbregts, S. C. J., & Swaab, H. (2010). Cognitive and environmental predictors of early literacy skills. Read Writ 24, 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9233-3

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Final step of the vocabulary hierarchical regression (N = 174): "None of the three interaction terms caused significant effects"; children below and above the median on cognitive control benefited equally from book exposure.

"The Model fit did not improve after interaction terms (book-cover x cognitive control measures) were entered. None of the three interaction terms caused significant effects."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cognitive-control-does-not-moderate-book-exposure
title Cognitive control mechanisms do not moderate the beneficial effects of book exposure on early literacy outcomes
description Cognitive control mechanisms do not moderate the beneficial effects of book exposure on early literacy outcomes
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2010
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — davidse-2010

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.