Bootstrapped self-consistency at temperature 1.0 flags potentially incorrect GPT-4 answers: about half of inconsistent responses were incorrect versus about 5% of consistent ones¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Over 50 repetitions per exam at temperature 1.0, GPT-4-0314 was inconsistent on 23 of 124 questions (43% of them incorrect) and GPT-4-0613 on 25 (56% incorrect), while only 4 of the consistent responses of each version were incorrect. → Joost C. F. de Winter 2024
Evidence¶
Joost C. F. de Winter 2024¶
Joost C. F. de Winter. (2024). Can ChatGPT Pass High School Exams on English Language Comprehension? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00372-z
q3 · i? · design · r2
Bootstrapping analysis submitting each exam to GPT-4 50 times (API 'n' parameter set to 50) at temperature 1.0, with answers classified as consistently correct, consistently incorrect, or inconsistent. Among inconsistent responses, "10 or 43% for GPT-4-0314; 14 or 56% for GPT-4-0613" were incorrect.
"Our analysis showed that out of 124 questions across the three exams combined, GPT-4-0314 displayed inconsistency in 23 cases (19%), while GPT-4-0613 displayed inconsistency in 25 cases (20%)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- GPT-4's March and June 2023 versions showed no notable overall difference on the English exams, but differed on individual questions — related
- Self-consistency did not improve GPT-4's answer accuracy on these exams, unlike in chain-of-thought tasks — related
- Exam questions that GPT-4 answered inconsistently or incorrectly were harder for human examinees, who scored about 63–68% on them versus about 75% on the rest — related
- GPT-3.5 passes Dutch VWO English reading comprehension exams with a mean grade of 7.3 with re-prompting, and 6.5 when only its first responses are scored — related
- GPT-4 significantly outperforms the average Dutch student on VWO English reading comprehension, scoring 8.3 (March) and 8.1 (June) without re-prompting — related
- The authors argue that LLMs such as GPT-3 threaten OBE validity by enabling answers without deep understanding, particularly in unproctored settings — related
- MELD analysis found no completion matched the MRCP sample paper at 95% or more, suggesting ChatGPT-4 was unlikely trained on it — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.