Claims

Exam questions that GPT-4 answered inconsistently or incorrectly were harder for human examinees, who scored about 63–68% on them versus about 75% on the rest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? For Exam 1, students averaged 63.0% (SD = 10.5%) and 67.7% (SD = 12.0%) on the questions GPT-4 answered inconsistently or incorrectly, versus 75.8% (SD = 12.7%) and 75.3% (SD = 13.2%) on the remaining questions. → Joost C. F. de Winter 2024

Evidence

Joost C. F. de Winter 2024

Joost C. F. de Winter. (2024). Can ChatGPT Pass High School Exams on English Language Comprehension? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00372-z

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Secondary correlational analysis using publicly available psychometric data for Exam 1 (CITO, 2022), comparing student performance on the 7 (GPT-4-0314) and 9 (GPT-4-0613) inconsistent or incorrectly answered questions against the remaining items. "questions that ChatGPT answered inconsistently or incorrectly appeared to pose greater challenges to human examinees".

"students achieved an average score of 63.0% ( SD = 10.5%) and 67.7% (SD = 12.0%), compared to 75.8% (SD = 12.7%) and 75.3% (SD = 13.2%) for the remaining questions (n = 36, n = 34)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.