Claims

When tested and new complementary information is presented together, interim testing on the tested material can impair learning of the new material (the borrowed time effect), which separate presentation can reverse

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In Finn and Roediger's face-name-profession study, interim testing on names improved name recall but impaired recall of professions compared with restudy. → Chunliang Yang 2018 q2 i? Separating the interim test from encoding of the new pairs reversed the impairment, so the Interim Test group recalled more professions than the Interim Restudy group. → Chunliang Yang 2018 (2)

Evidence

Chunliang Yang 2018

Chunliang Yang, Rosalind Potts and David R. Shanks. (2018). Enhancing learning and retrieval of new information: a review of the forward testing effect. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0024-y

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports Finn and Roediger's face-name-profession experiment with a 24-hour delayed final test, where the Interim Test group tested on names saw faces with names and professions presented simultaneously afterwards; the quote gives the reversed pattern attributed to names borrowing encoding time.

"the Interim Test group correctly recalled more names than the Interim Restudy group, whereas the recall of professions showed the reverse pattern: The Interim Restudy group recalled more professions than the Interim Test group"

Chunliang Yang 2018 (2)

Chunliang Yang, Rosalind Potts and David R. Shanks. (2018). Enhancing learning and retrieval of new information: a review of the forward testing effect. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0024-y

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports Davis and Chan's Experiment 4, which separated the interim test on face-name pairs from the encoding of face-profession pairs; the quote shows the negative effect was eliminated and reversed, though the review notes testing then impaired memory for names relative to restudy.

"the Interim Test group recalled more professions than the Interim Restudy group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id borrowed-time-effect-impairs-new-learning
title When tested and new complementary information is presented together, interim testing on the tested material can impair learning of the new material (the borrowed time effect), which separate presentation can reverse
description When tested and new complementary information is presented together, interim testing on the tested material can impair learning of the new material (the borrowed time effect), which separate presentation can reverse
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — chunliang-yang-2018, chunliang-yang-2018-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.