In paired-associate learning, interim testing about doubles recall of new face-name and foreign-translation pairs relative to a distractor control¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the face-name paired-associate studies reviewed, the Interim Test group correctly recalled about twice as many names as the Interim Distractor group in the List 4 interim test. → Chunliang Yang 2018
Evidence¶
Chunliang Yang 2018¶
Chunliang Yang, Rosalind Potts and David R. Shanks. (2018). Enhancing learning and retrieval of new information: a review of the forward testing effect. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0024-y
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports paired-associate forward testing experiments by Weinstein et al. and Yang et al. using four lists of face-name pairs with Interim Test and Interim Distractor conditions; the quote gives the doubled name recall, and the review adds that distractor groups showed substantially more PI and that the effect extends to Swahili-English and Euskara-English pairs.
"the Interim Test group correctly recalled about twice as many names as the Interim Distractor group in the List 4 interim test"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- When tested and new complementary information is presented together, interim testing on the tested material can impair learning of the new material (the borrowed time effect), which separate presentation can reverse — reports the opposite
- In single item learning, interim testing of studied lists roughly doubles recall of new items compared with distractor or restudy control groups — related
- Making JOLs with word stems enhances interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy — related
- Making JOLs with complete words did not significantly enhance interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy — related
- Overt retrieval practice enhances interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy, and does not differ from JOLs with word stems — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
forward-testing-paired-associates |
title |
In paired-associate learning, interim testing about doubles recall of new face-name and foreign-translation pairs relative to a distractor control |
description |
In paired-associate learning, interim testing about doubles recall of new face-name and foreign-translation pairs relative to a distractor control |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — chunliang-yang-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.