Both groups improved their speaking scores from pre-test to post-test, but the Small Group Activity group's mean gain (25.35) was larger than the Individual Activity group's (11.64)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Students taught with video clips in either mode improved from pre-test to post-test, with a mean gain of 25.35 for the Small Group Activity group and 11.64 for the Individual Activity group. → Muslem 2017

Evidence¶

Muslem 2017¶

Muslem, A., Mustafa, F., Usman, B., & Rahman, A. (2017). The Application of Video Clips with Small Group and Individual Activities to Improve Young Learners' Speaking Performance. Teaching English with Technology, 17(4), 25-37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1159095

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive pre-test/post-test means from the quasi-experiment: SGA rose from 41.82 (SD 6.33) to 67.27 (SD 11.93); IA rose from 39.65 (SD 8.66) to 51.29 (SD 13.94). The quoted sentence reports the printed mean gains; no effect size was printed.

"The difference between the pre-test and post-test m eans was 25.35 for the Small Group Activity students and 11.64 for the Individual Activity group students."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Video clips combined with Small Group Activities produced significantly higher EFL speaking post-test scores than video clips combined with Individual Activities for young learners — related
• The Small Group Activity group outperformed the Individual Activity group on all five measured speaking aspects (vocabulary, fluency, grammar, pronunciation, comprehension) — a narrower finding that bears on this claim