Claims

Video clips combined with Small Group Activities produced significantly higher EFL speaking post-test scores than video clips combined with Individual Activities for young learners

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Seventh-grade EFL students taught speaking with video clips in Small Group Activities scored significantly higher on the post-test than students taught with video clips in Individual Activities (67.27 vs 51.29, sig. 2-tailed 0.000). → Muslem 2017

Evidence

Muslem 2017

Muslem, A., Mustafa, F., Usman, B., & Rahman, A. (2017). The Application of Video Clips with Small Group and Individual Activities to Improve Young Learners' Speaking Performance. Teaching English with Technology, 17(4), 25-37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1159095

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent t-test on post-test speaking scores from a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test study with two intact classes (SGA n=33, IA n=34). The t-test gave t = 5.032 with sig. 2-tailed 0.000, so "H 0 is rejected and H a is accepted". No effect size was printed.

"It can clearly be seen that the level of significance (sig. 2 tailed) is 0.000 < 0. 05. Therefore, it has been proven that H 0 is rejected and H a is accepted."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.