Claims

Both SMS and paper-based exercise groups improved vocabulary scores significantly from pre-test to post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Paired t-tests showed post-test means significantly higher than pre-test means in both the paper-based and SMS groups (p = .000). → Suwantarathip 2015

Evidence

Suwantarathip 2015

Suwantarathip, O., & Orawiwatnakul, W. (2015). Using mobile-assisted exercises to support students’ vocabulary skill development. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 163–171. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1057347

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Paired samples t-tests within each group of 40 students over a seven-week semester. Paper-based group rose from 22.85 to 29.70 and SMS group from 22.57 to 33.25 out of 50 points; the article reports "the post-test mean scores were significantly higher than the pre-test mean scores in both groups".

"From t-test analysis, the post-test mean scores were significantly higher than the pre-test mean scores in both groups (p = .000)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.