Both the SMS and control groups improved significantly from pretest to posttest in the programming course¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Control group pretest-to-posttest gains were significant (t(22) = -27.35, p = .00). → Al-Mothana M. Gasaymeh & Osamah M. Aldalalah 2013
q2 i? Experimental group pretest-to-posttest gains were significant (t(28) = -46.91, p = .00). → Al-Mothana M. Gasaymeh & Osamah M. Aldalalah 2013 (2)
Evidence¶
Al-Mothana M. Gasaymeh & Osamah M. Aldalalah 2013¶
Al-Mothana M. Gasaymeh & Osamah M. Aldalalah. (2013). The Impact of Using SMS as Learning Support Tool on Students' Learning. International Education Studies, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n10p112
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Dependent-samples t-test for the 23-student control section receiving only face-to-face instruction; means rose from 15.21 to 69.34 with "t (22) = -27.35, p = .00".
"the mean of the pretest scores (M = 15.21, SD = 6.12) was significantly different than the mean of the posttest scores (M = 69.34, SD = 13.50), t (22) = -27.35, p = .00."
Al-Mothana M. Gasaymeh & Osamah M. Aldalalah 2013 (2)¶
Al-Mothana M. Gasaymeh & Osamah M. Aldalalah. (2013). The Impact of Using SMS as Learning Support Tool on Students' Learning. International Education Studies, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n10p112
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Dependent-samples t-test for the 29-student SMS-supported experimental section; means rose from 15.69 to 77.93 with "t (28) = -46.91, p = .00".
"for the experimental group, the mean of the pretest scores (M = 15.69, SD = 6.23) for the participants was significantly different than the mean of the posttest scores (M = 77.93, SD = 9.86), t (28) = -46.91, p = .00."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students receiving SMS learning support scored significantly higher on the programming posttest than control students — related
- Both experimental and control groups improved significantly from pretest to posttest over the four-month period — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.