Both the graphic-novel and traditional-activity groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test, with a larger gain in the experimental group¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Within-group Wilcoxon comparisons showed significant pre-to-post improvement for the control group (z=-4.666; p<0.05) and the experimental group (z=-4.862; p<0.05), with gains of nearly 9 and nearly 16 points respectively. → Ahmet Başal 2016
Evidence¶
Ahmet Başal 2016¶
Ahmet Başal, Talat Aytan & İbrahim Demir. (2016). Teaching Vocabulary with Graphic Novels. English Language Teaching, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n9p95
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Wilcoxon within-group comparisons in the same quasi-experiment: both groups "significantly improved their scores at the post-test"; the experimental gain was nearly 16 points versus nearly 9 for the control. No effect size is printed.
"The pre- and post-test results for the control group were z=-4,666; p<0, 05 and for the experimental z=-4,862; p<0, 05. According to this result, the difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the control group was nearly 9 points, and the difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental group was nearly 16 points"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Both experimental and control students showed significant pre-to-post gains on the Newton's Laws achievement test — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Both instructional groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test, with larger gains in the generative AI-supported group — related
- Within the experimental group, achievement rose significantly from pre-test to post-test, while the control group's gain was not statistically significant — related
- Both experimental and control groups improved their proportional reasoning scores from pretest to posttest — related
- Both experimental and control groups improved significantly on all questions and conceptual questions from pre- to post-test after using PyKinetic — related
- Both instructional conditions produced statistically significant pre-test to post-test gains in NOS and SK views, with larger effect sizes in the experimental group — related
- No significant difference existed between the graphic-novel and control groups on the pre-test — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.