Both experimental and control groups improved their proportional reasoning scores from pretest to posttest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group's pretest-posttest PRT difference was statistically significant in favor of the posttest (Wilcoxon Z=-3.393, p=.001). → Şen 2017
q2 i? The control group's pretest-posttest PRT difference was also statistically significant in favor of the posttest (Wilcoxon Z=-2.473, p=.013). → Şen 2017 (2)
Evidence¶
Şen 2017¶
Şen, C., & Güler, G. (2017). Effect of Strategy Teaching For the Solution of Ratio Problems on Students' Proportional Reasoning Skills. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1142503
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test of the experimental group's (n=16) pretest-posttest PRT scores; the table prints Z=-3.393, p=.001, with 15 positive ranks and 1 negative rank. The text states the difference was "in favor of the posttest scores".
"In Table 4, it is seen that there was a statistically significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores of experimental group students, and this difference was in favor of the posttest scores (p=.002<.05)."
Şen 2017 (2)¶
Şen, C., & Güler, G. (2017). Effect of Strategy Teaching For the Solution of Ratio Problems on Students' Proportional Reasoning Skills. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1142503
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test of the control group's (n=16) pretest-posttest PRT scores; the table prints Z=-2.473, p=.013, with 13 positive ranks, 1 negative rank, and 2 equal. No effect size is printed.
"In Table 5, it is seen that there was a statistically significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores of control group students and this difference was in favor of the posttest scores (p<.05)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Proportional Reasoning — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Teaching problem-solving strategies for ratio problems raises sixth-graders' proportional reasoning posttest scores above regular instruction — related
- Reasoning scores of both prospective and current faculty teachers increased significantly during the short pedagogical training, but noticing did not improve significantly in either group — related
- Inquiry-based instruction significantly improved pre-service science teachers' scientific process skills from pretest to post-test in a university biology laboratory — related
- Both experimental and control students showed significant pre-to-post gains on the Newton's Laws achievement test — related
- Both the graphic-novel and traditional-activity groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test, with a larger gain in the experimental group — related
- The experimental group improved significantly from pre-test to post-test after learning the synthesis strategy — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.