Claims

Only Page readers tended to locate boundary-zone sentences more accurately than central-zone sentences

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 1997 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The presentation-by-zone interaction was marginal (p = 0.11); only with Page were boundary-zone sentences located more accurately than central-zone ones. → Annie Piolat 1997

Evidence

Annie Piolat 1997

Annie Piolat, Jean-Yves Roussey and Olivier Thunin. (1997). Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1997.0145

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Experiment 1 analysis of pointing accuracy by sentence zone (boundary vs. central). The interaction was marginal, F(1, 68) = 2.55, p = 0.11, and the Page simple effect did not reach significance (p = 0.12).

"it was only with Page that the sentences in the boundary zones were located more accurately than those in the central zones (6.95 vs. 8.40;F(1, 68) = 2.44, p = 0.12, see Table 2)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id boundary-zone-locating-advantage-page-only
title Only Page readers tended to locate boundary-zone sentences more accurately than central-zone sentences
description Only Page readers tended to locate boundary-zone sentences more accurately than central-zone sentences
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1997
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — annie-piolat-1997

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.