Claims

Middle school students used BrainPOP ESL far more than high school students and reported more positive experiences with the tool

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Middle school students logged into BrainPOP ESL more than twice as frequently on average (182 logins) as high school students (74 logins), and completed 109 versus 60 learning activities on average. → Luke 2017

Evidence

Luke 2017

Luke, Christina C.; Gibson, Sierra; Francisco, Aubrey T. (2017). Rapid Cycle Pilots: Using Edtech to Support English Learners. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/383e02ba-587a-4192-be68-175543798661 doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/26

q2 · i? · design · r2

Reported usage comparison by school level in Vista, from surveys and developer-provided usage data (Figure 8 shows logins by school). Surveys and focus groups indicated middle school students and educators found the content more engaging than high school students and educators did.

"students in middle school logged into BrainPOP ESL more than twice as frequently (182 logins) on average as high school students (74 logins) over the course of the pilot. In addition, middle school students completed an average of 109 learning activities compared to 60 for high school students"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id brainpop-middle-school-more-engaged-than-high-school
title Middle school students used BrainPOP ESL far more than high school students and reported more positive experiences with the tool
description Middle school students used BrainPOP ESL far more than high school students and reported more positive experiences with the tool
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — luke-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.