Students used their assigned ed-tech tools far below recommended levels, and usage declined over the summer¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Kettle Moraine students averaged 54 minutes per week on TenMarks over 11 weeks, less than a third of the recommended three hours per week, with usage declining week to week. → Christina Luke 2016
q2 i? In Elizabeth Forward, weekly logins decreased dramatically and time using Amplify fell from close to 3.5 hours to just over one hour per week by the end of summer. → Christina Luke 2016 (2)
Evidence¶
Christina Luke 2016¶
Christina Luke, Christa M. Simone, Aubrey T. Francisco. (2016). Rapid Cycle Pilots: Summer Ed-Tech Programs. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/8017846c-4099-4af3-92e4-462cd5d6262d doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/26
q2 · i? · design · r2
Product usage data from the Kettle Moraine TenMarks pilot, shown in Figure 3; the report adds that usage declined from week to week, suggesting motivation dwindled, though active weekly users remained relatively stable.
"students at Kettle Moraine engaged with TenMarks for an average of 54 minutes per week over 11 weeks in the summer, which is less than a third of the recommended three hours per week"
Christina Luke 2016 (2)¶
Christina Luke, Christa M. Simone, Aubrey T. Francisco. (2016). Rapid Cycle Pilots: Summer Ed-Tech Programs. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/8017846c-4099-4af3-92e4-462cd5d6262d
q2 · i? · design · r2
Elizabeth Forward Amplify usage data shown in Figure 8; the report states these low rates of usage may have contributed to the lack of gains in student learning, and that logins decreased dramatically over the five-week program.
"the amount of time using the tool each week decreased from close to 3.5 hours to just over one hour a week by the end of the summer"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A matched-comparison analysis found no effect of the TenMarks summer program on NWEA MAP math scores — related
- In the reviewed RCT, students averaged 21.8 hours of DreamBox usage, below the developer's recommended 90 minutes per week — related
- Classworks students used the program an average of 11 minutes per week over 30 weeks — related
- Early trends suggest students of teachers using ASSISTments as the sole math edtech tool may have benefited more than students where it was part of a suite of tools — related
- The report attributes stagnant learning results to program implementation rather than to the ed-tech tools themselves — related
- Math gains from the CAL program occur in classrooms with at least an average of 35 minutes of practice per week — related
- Odyssey® Math usage varied across classrooms in the DiLeo (2007) trial, partly because of differential access to technology — related
- Middle school students used BrainPOP ESL far more than high school students and reported more positive experiences with the tool — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
low-declining-summer-edtech-usage |
title |
Students used their assigned ed-tech tools far below recommended levels, and usage declined over the summer |
description |
Students used their assigned ed-tech tools far below recommended levels, and usage declined over the summer |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — christina-luke-2016, christina-luke-2016-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.