Claims

A course schedule guided by Bloom's Revised Taxonomy is proposed to raise the planned contribution ratings of six program learning outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The proposal's program-outcomes matrix raises the planned rating of the studio course's contribution from 3 to 4 (on a 0–5 scale) for program learning outcomes 1, 2, 3, 10, 14 and 15, the outcomes the authors intend the new schedule to affect; no outcome was measured. → Sözen 2024

Evidence

Sözen 2024

Sözen, G., & Özen-Yavuz, A. (2024). Proposing a course schedule for architectural basic design studio guided by Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. Turkish Journal of Education, 13(4), 379-409. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.1495965

q1 · course design proposal · i? · no outcome measured · design · r1

The article proposes a course schedule for an architectural basic design studio built on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy (BRT). Its program learning outcomes matrix (Table 1) rates how strongly the course contributes to each program outcome on a 0–5 scale, and marks the six outcomes the new schedule is expected to affect, whose planned ratings rise from 3 to 4. These are the authors' design intentions: no students were assessed before and after, so the matrix shows what the schedule is meant to change, not an observed effect.

"it is intended to observe the effect of BRT on program learning outcomes 1, 2, 3, 10, 14, 15"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id brt-schedule-raised-plo-degrees
title A course schedule guided by Bloom's Revised Taxonomy is proposed to raise the planned contribution ratings of six program learning outcomes
description A course schedule guided by Bloom's Revised Taxonomy is proposed to raise the planned contribution ratings of six program learning outcomes
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sözen-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.