Claims

In the joint context, NMF-derived BtBC cluster slopes predicted learning: Cluster 1 negatively with RT slope and Cluster 2 positively with intra-brain connectivity slope

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Design limits · Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang 2024: no comparison group (read from the study by two models, 2026-10-26)

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 The slope of BtBC within NMF-derived Cluster 1 (parietal–occipital to frontal) was negatively correlated with the slope of RT in the joint context (r = −0.39, P = 0.043). → Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang 2024 q3 i3 The slope of BtBC within NMF-derived Cluster 2 (parietal–parietal) was positively correlated with the slope of intra-brain functional connectivity in the joint context (r = 0.44, P = 0.021). → Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang 2024 (2)

Evidence

Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang 2024

Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang. (2024). Interbrain neural correlates of self and other integration in joint statistical learning. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00280-4

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Pearson correlation between NMF-clustered BtBC slopes and behavioural learning slopes, significant only for the joint context: Cluster 1 BtBC slope correlated negatively with RT slope, r = −0.39, P = 0.043.

"the slope of BtBC within NMF-derived Cluster 1 (see Fig. 3e) was negatively correlated with the slope of RT ( r = −0.39, P = 0.043; see Fig. 3f), indi- cating that the increasing trend in BtBC (i.e., a more positive slope) within Cluster 1 predicted the decreasing trend in RT"

Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang 2024 (2)

Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang. (2024). Interbrain neural correlates of self and other integration in joint statistical learning. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00280-4

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Pearson correlation in the joint context between Cluster 2 (parietal–parietal) BtBC slopes and intra-brain functional-connectivity slopes: r = 0.44, P = 0.021, with correlations observed only for the joint context.

"the slope of BtBC within NMF-derived Cluster 2 (see Fig. 3g) was positively correlated with the slope of intra-brain functional connectivity ( r = 0.44, P = 0.021; see Fig. 3h), indicating that the increasing trend in BtBC (i.e., the more positive slope) within Cluster 2 predicted the increasing trend in intra-brain functional connectivity"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id btbc-cluster-slopes-predict-learning-outcomes-joint
title In the joint context, NMF-derived BtBC cluster slopes predicted learning: Cluster 1 negatively with RT slope and Cluster 2 positively with intra-brain connectivity slope
description In the joint context, NMF-derived BtBC cluster slopes predicted learning: Cluster 1 negatively with RT slope and Cluster 2 positively with intra-brain connectivity slope
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — zheng-zheng-jun-wang-2024, zheng-zheng-jun-wang-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.