Inserting an interference sequence disrupted and then recovered joint-context performance: RT rose from Block 6 to 7 and fell from Block 7 to 8 only in the joint context¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? RTs increased significantly from Block 6 to the interference Block 7 in the joint context (M = 412 ms to M = 425 ms) but not in the baseline context. → Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang 2024 q3 i? RTs recovered significantly from Block 7 to Block 8 in the joint context (M = 425 ms to M = 413 ms) but not in the baseline context. → Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang 2024 (2)

Evidence¶

Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang 2024¶

Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang. (2024). Interbrain neural correlates of self and other integration in joint statistical learning. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00280-4

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Interference-effect LMM on modulating-phase RTs: the phase × context interaction was significant (β = −19.50, P = 0.001), and simple effects showed RT rose significantly in the joint context from Block 6 to Block 7 (β = 13.14, P < 0.001) but not in baseline; no printed effect size.

"A follow-up simple effect analysis showed that the RTs was signi ficantly larger in Block 7 (M = 425 ms, SE = 6.95) than in Block 6 ( M = 412 ms, SE = 6.95) for the joint context (β = 13.14,SE = 3.38,t = 3.89,P < 0.001)"

Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang 2024 (2)¶

Zheng Zheng & Jun Wang. (2024). Interbrain neural correlates of self and other integration in joint statistical learning. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00280-4

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Recovery-effect LMM: the phase × context interaction was significant (β = −11.94, P = 0.045); simple effects showed RT fell significantly from Block 7 to Block 8 in the joint context (β = 12.28, P < 0.001) with no difference in baseline; no printed effect size.

"The follow-up simple effect analysis showed that the RTs was signi ficantly larger in Block 7 (M = 425 ms, SE = 6.95) than in Block 8 ( M = 413 ms, SE = 6.95) for the joint context (β = 12.28, SE = 3.39, t = 3.63, P < 0.001), but no signi ficant differences in RTs were observed between Block 7"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A joint context with an active co-actor produces a steeper reaction-time learning slope than a baseline context with a passive observer in a complementary statistical learning task — related
• In the joint context, NMF-derived BtBC cluster slopes predicted learning: Cluster 1 negatively with RT slope and Cluster 2 positively with intra-brain connectivity slope — related
• P3 reductions during learning and P3 enhancement under interference occurred only for self-relevant trials in the joint context, with no learning effects on self-irrelevant trials — related