Bully group children make more unfavorable Deck A choices on the Iowa Gambling Task than bully-victim children¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i3 Children classified as bullies chose more cards from disadvantageous Deck A than bully-victims (r = 0.50), suggesting difficulty in affective decision-making. → Medeiros W 2016

Evidence¶

Medeiros W 2016¶

Medeiros W, Torro-Alves N, Malloy-Diniz LF and Minervino CM (2016) Executive Functions in Children Who Experience Bullying Situations. Front. Psychol. 7:1197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01197

q2 · i3 · associational · r1

Cross-sectional quasi-experimental comparison of four PAVS-classified groups (n = 15 each) of 10–11-year-olds. Mann–Whitney tests showed that the bully group had "the highest score considering all choices from Deck A compared to the bully-victim group" with r = 0.50; bullies did not differ significantly from victims or controls.

"Mann–Whitney tests showed that the bully group had the highest score considering all choices from Deck A compared to the bully-victim group (U= 34.5 z=− 2.755, p= 0.006, r= 0.50)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• No significant group differences in Stroop color and word card times or in error rates on any Stroop card
• No significant group differences on Iowa Gambling Task block trends, overall trend, or Decks B, C, and D choices — related