Claims

BVI students face material and instructional barriers: late STEM materials, error-laden tactile worksheets, and variable teacher graphic descriptions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? About 85% of surveyed middle and high school BVI students reported STEM materials arrived late at least some of the time. → Steinbach 2022 q2 i? Only 5% of braille/tactile math and science worksheets were error-free and 20% had five or more errors. → Steinbach 2022 (2) q2 i? Teachers of the visually impaired showed wide variability in how they described mathematics graphics to students. → Steinbach 2022 (3)

Evidence

Steinbach 2022

Steinbach, S. (2022). Looking beyond vision: Supports for students who are blind or visually impaired in mathematics. NWEA. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/looking-beyond-vision-supports-for-students-who-are-blind-or-visually-impaired-in-mathematics/

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing Bell & Silverman (2019), a survey in which "About 85% of middle and high school BVI students surveyed reported" their STEM materials arrived late at least some of the time. Descriptive percentage only.

"About 85% of middle and high school BVI students surveyed reported that their science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) materials arrived late at least some of the time (Bell & Silverman, 2019)."

Steinbach 2022 (2)

Steinbach, S. (2022). Looking beyond vision: Supports for students who are blind or visually impaired in mathematics. NWEA. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/looking-beyond-vision-supports-for-students-who-are-blind-or-visually-impaired-in-mathematics/

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review attributes to Herzberg & Rosenblum (2014) a quality assessment of braille and tactile math/science worksheet production finding "only 5% of worksheets given to students were totally without error" and 20% had five or more errors.

"a study assessing the quality of the production of braille and tactile math and science worksheets (Herzberg & Rosenblum, 2014) found that only 5% of worksheets given to students were totally without error and 20% had five or more errors."

Steinbach 2022 (3)

Steinbach, S. (2022). Looking beyond vision: Supports for students who are blind or visually impaired in mathematics. NWEA. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/looking-beyond-vision-supports-for-students-who-are-blind-or-visually-impaired-in-mathematics/

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing Rosenblum et al. (2020), that with 10 teachers of the visually impaired describing mathematics graphics per national guidelines, there was "wide variability in how teachers described the graphics" and questioned students about them.

"when 10 teachers of the visually impaired were asked to describe mathematics graphics to BVIs according to the National Council of Accessible Materials' guidelines, Rosenblum et al. (2020) discovered that there was wide variability in how teachers described the graphics, and in how they questioned students about the graphics features and the information presented."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id bvi-material-instructional-barriers
title BVI students face material and instructional barriers: late STEM materials, error-laden tactile worksheets, and variable teacher graphic descriptions
description BVI students face material and instructional barriers: late STEM materials, error-laden tactile worksheets, and variable teacher graphic descriptions
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
recheck_by 2027
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — steinbach-2022, steinbach-2022-2, steinbach-2022-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.