A multisensory tablet with tonal and vibration feedback produced no significant difference in graphics-comprehension accuracy compared with tactile graphics¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Among 22 BVI students asked questions about graphics, there was no significant difference in the number of correct answers between those using a tablet with tonal and vibration feedback and those using tactile representations. → Steinbach 2022
Evidence¶
Steinbach 2022¶
Steinbach, S. (2022). Looking beyond vision: Supports for students who are blind or visually impaired in mathematics. NWEA. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/looking-beyond-vision-supports-for-students-who-are-blind-or-visually-impaired-in-mathematics/
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports, citing Hahn et al. (2019), a study of 22 BVIs comparing a Samsung multimodal tablet with tonal and vibration feedback against tactile representations of the same graphics; "there was no significant difference in the number of correct answers in either group." No effect size printed; equivalence was not tested.
"Hahn et al. (2019) used a Samsung multimodal tablet in combination with Google Classroom to ask 22 BVIs questions about graphics. Some students were provided with the tablet, which had tonal and vibration feedback, while others were given tactile representations of the same graphics. The authors found that there was no significant difference in the number of correct answers in either group."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Combining voiced auditory descriptions with tactile graphics increased braille readers' likelihood of answering assessment items correctly — related
- BVI students face material and instructional barriers: late STEM materials, error-laden tactile worksheets, and variable teacher graphic descriptions — related
- Vision is not required for developing number sense and math skills in BVI learners — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
multisensory-tablet-no-difference-tactile-graphics |
title |
A multisensory tablet with tonal and vibration feedback produced no significant difference in graphics-comprehension accuracy compared with tactile graphics |
description |
A multisensory tablet with tonal and vibration feedback produced no significant difference in graphics-comprehension accuracy compared with tactile graphics |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — steinbach-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.