Claims

CAD-supported simulation activity produces higher-rated design ideas than conventional method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Simulation-stage products from the CAD-integrated group scored significantly higher (M=80.5) than conventional products (M=66.9). → Isham Shah bin Hassan 2011

Evidence

Isham Shah bin Hassan 2011

Isham Shah bin Hassan, Ramlee Mustafa & Mohd Arif Ismail. (2011). Mobile Technology and CAD Technology Integration in Teaching Architectural Design Process for Producing Creative Product. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102114

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent t-test on simulation-stage products evaluated with a 20-item instrument (alpha 0.9570). The article reports "t (118) = 12.267, significant", concluding the integrated method produced better design ideas.

"Inferential data shows there is a significant difference between final design idea produced in simulation activity using CAD technology integration (M=80.5) compared to final design idea produced in simulation activity using conventional method (M=66.9), t (118) = 12.267, significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.