Integrating mobile and CAD technology in the design process produces final architectural products rated significantly more creative than conventional method¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Final products from the treatment group scored significantly higher on overall creativity (M=79.1) than control group products (M=70.5). → Isham Shah bin Hassan 2011

Evidence¶

Isham Shah bin Hassan 2011¶

Isham Shah bin Hassan, Ramlee Mustafa & Mohd Arif Ismail. (2011). Mobile Technology and CAD Technology Integration in Teaching Architectural Design Process for Producing Creative Product. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102114

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with 120 final-semester diploma architecture students from four Malaysian polytechnics (60 treatment, 60 control); final products evaluated by experts using a CPAM-based instrument. The article reports "t (118) = 10.610 significant" for the overall creative aspect comparison.

"Research outcomes also show that there is a significant difference between final product produced through the design process that being integrated with mobile and CAD technology (M=79.1) compared to final product produced using conventional method (M=70.5) from creativity aspect, t (118) = 10.610 significant."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• CAD-supported simulation activity produces higher-rated design ideas than conventional method — related
• CAD integration at the synthesis stage increases idea generation and 2D-to-3D sketch changes and yields higher-rated synthesis products — related
• Treatment-group final products score significantly higher on all three CPAM creativity aspects: uniqueness, practicality and detail — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• A mobile real-case website increases students' design information searching and the quality of analysis-stage design information — related