Claims

The CAI package on Work, Power and Energy significantly improved physics achievement for girls in the IX standard experimental group, significant at the 0.05 level only

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental-group girls scored significantly higher than control-group girls on the posttest criterion test (means 62 vs 52), significant at 0.05 level only. → Maheswari and Ramakrishnan 2015

Evidence

Maheswari and Ramakrishnan 2015

I. Uma Maheswari, N. Ramakrishnan. (2015). EFFECTIVENESS OF CAI PACKAGE ON ACHIEVEMENT IN PHYSICS OF IX STANDARD STUDENTS. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, Vol. 10 No. 4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1097442

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Subgroup t-test on posttest CTWPE scores for the 40 girls (20 experimental, 20 control). The article reports a t value of 2.567, "significant at 0.05 level only for the df 38", with the experimental mean of 62 above the control mean of 52.

"the 't' value between the experimental and control groups' girls in their mean achievement on Criterion Test Work, Power and Energy is 2.567. It is significant at 0.05 level only for the df 38. The mean of Experimental group (62) is higher than the mean of control group (52)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.