Claims

Learning the physics unit Work, Power and Energy through a CAI package produced significantly higher posttest achievement than traditional teaching among IX standard students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? IX standard students taught with the CAI package scored significantly higher on the criterion test posttest than the traditionally taught control group (means 69 vs 58). → Maheswari and Ramakrishnan 2015

Evidence

Maheswari and Ramakrishnan 2015

I. Uma Maheswari, N. Ramakrishnan. (2015). EFFECTIVENESS OF CAI PACKAGE ON ACHIEVEMENT IN PHYSICS OF IX STANDARD STUDENTS. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, Vol. 10 No. 4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1097442

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pretest-posttest equivalent groups experiment with two Madurai schools; 40 experimental and 40 control students, equated on entry-level test. The t-test on posttest CTWPE scores gave a t value of 4.695 with "significant at 0.01 and 0.05 level for the DF 78"; the experimental mean of 69 exceeded the control mean of 58.

"the 't' value between the experimental and control groups' students in their mean achievement on Criterion Test Work, Power and Energy is 4.695. It is significant at 0.01 and 0.05 level for the DF 78. The mean of Experimental group (69) is higher than the mean of control group (58)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.