Learning the physics unit Work, Power and Energy through a CAI package produced significantly higher posttest achievement than traditional teaching among IX standard students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? IX standard students taught with the CAI package scored significantly higher on the criterion test posttest than the traditionally taught control group (means 69 vs 58). → Maheswari and Ramakrishnan 2015
Evidence¶
Maheswari and Ramakrishnan 2015¶
I. Uma Maheswari, N. Ramakrishnan. (2015). EFFECTIVENESS OF CAI PACKAGE ON ACHIEVEMENT IN PHYSICS OF IX STANDARD STUDENTS. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, Vol. 10 No. 4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1097442
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Pretest-posttest equivalent groups experiment with two Madurai schools; 40 experimental and 40 control students, equated on entry-level test. The t-test on posttest CTWPE scores gave a t value of 4.695 with "significant at 0.01 and 0.05 level for the DF 78"; the experimental mean of 69 exceeded the control mean of 58.
"the 't' value between the experimental and control groups' students in their mean achievement on Criterion Test Work, Power and Energy is 4.695. It is significant at 0.01 and 0.05 level for the DF 78. The mean of Experimental group (69) is higher than the mean of control group (58)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The CAI package on Work, Power and Energy significantly improved physics achievement for boys in the IX standard experimental group — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- The CAI package on Work, Power and Energy significantly improved physics achievement for girls in the IX standard experimental group, significant at the 0.05 level only — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Class IX physical science students taught with the constructivist 7E model achieved significantly higher post-test and gain scores than students taught with traditional methods — related
- The control group showed no significant pre-test to post-test difference under conventional teaching — related
- Standard IX students taught with an interactive multimedia learning package show significantly higher post-test attitude towards mathematics than students taught by the traditional method — related
- Multimedia modular instruction produces significantly higher speaking-skill post-test scores than traditional method among student-teachers. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.