The CAI group shows no statistically significant pre-test to post-test gain in learning Voice in English Grammar¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The mean score difference between post-test and pre-test in the CAI group is not statistically significant at 0.01 level (t = 0.32). → R. Ramesh & B. Sumathi 2010

Evidence¶

R. Ramesh & B. Sumathi 2010¶

R. Ramesh & B. Sumathi. (2010). CAI in Learning Voice in English Grammar among Eighth Standard Students – An Experimental Study. li-manager's Journal of School Educational Technology. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102768

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group comparison in the CAI (experimental) group of 46 students; Table 4 reports a mean score difference of 8.92 (post-test 59.35 vs pre-test 50.43) with t = 0.32, not significant at 0.01 level. No effect size is printed.

"From Table 4 it is shown that there is a mean score difference in learning Voice in English Grammar between the post and pre test phase among the Eighth Standard Students in CAI group. However, these differences are not statistically significant at 0.01 level."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Syntax — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Eighth-standard students learning English grammar voice through CAI show a significantly larger mean gain score than students taught through conventional instruction — reports the opposite
• Sex does not significantly influence gain in learning Voice in English Grammar in the CIM and CAI groups — related
• The experimental group showed a statistically significant gain from pretest to post-test after personalized grammar instruction — related
• Blackboard-based instruction produced statistically significant pre-to-post achievement gains in the EFL teaching methods course for the experimental group — related