Sex does not significantly influence gain in learning Voice in English Grammar in the CIM and CAI groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The difference in gain between male and female students in the CIM and CAI groups is not statistically significant at 0.01 level. → R. Ramesh & B. Sumathi 2010

Evidence¶

R. Ramesh & B. Sumathi 2010¶

R. Ramesh & B. Sumathi. (2010). CAI in Learning Voice in English Grammar among Eighth Standard Students – An Experimental Study. li-manager's Journal of School Educational Technology. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102768

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Moderator analysis of the sex variable on gain scores in the CIM and CAI groups (Table 6); the difference is not statistically significant at 0.01 level. No effect size is printed.

"From Table 6, it is clear that there is a difference in gain in learning Voice in English Grammar between male and female students of CIM and CAI group. But, it is not statistically significant at 0.01 level."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The CAI group shows no statistically significant pre-test to post-test gain in learning Voice in English Grammar — related
• Eighth-standard students learning English grammar voice through CAI show a significantly larger mean gain score than students taught through conventional instruction — related
• Gender disparities in CT education show a very small but statistically significant overall effect favoring males (g = 0.106) — related
• Pedagogical tool significantly moderates the CT gender gap, with programming and robots associated with male-favoring gaps and other tools (e.g., web-based) showing a negative significant effect — related