Claims

72% of treatment students found the CALL teacher's method interesting and motivating, while 28% disliked it due to unfamiliarity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Most treatment students rated the CALL teacher's method as interesting and motivating (40% strongly agreed, 32% agreed to some extent). → Nguyen Van Han & Henriette van Rensburg 2014

Evidence

Nguyen Van Han & Henriette van Rensburg 2014

Nguyen Van Han & Henriette van Rensburg. (2014). The Effect of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Performance in the Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC) Listening Module. English Language Teaching, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n2p30

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Post-course questionnaire item on the CALL teacher's method (Table 9). "72% of the students found that the teacher's method was interesting and motivating"; 28% did not like it because they were not familiar with the new CALL-based method.

"Thus, 72% of the students found that the teacher's method was interesting and motivating. Whereas, 28% of them did not like the teaching method because they were not familiar with the new CALL-based method (See table 9)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.