Claims

Concept attainment model instruction yields higher adjusted physics concept understanding scores than traditional method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Ninth graders taught with the concept attainment model scored significantly higher on adjusted physics concept understanding than those taught with traditional method (ANCOVA F = 701.96, p < .01). → Kumar 2013

Evidence

Kumar 2013

Kumar, A., & Mathur, M. (2013). Effect of Concept Attainment Model on Acquisition of Physics Concepts. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2013.010304

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental study of 228 ninth-grade students in two Mohindergarh schools; ANCOVA with pre-physics concept understanding and intelligence as covariates found the "adjusted F-value is 701.96, which is significant at 0.01 level". Adjusted means were 85.61 (CAM) versus 65.58 (TM).

"the adjusted F-value is 701.96, which is significant at 0.01 level with df = 1/6904.07. It indicates that the adjusted mean scores of CAM and TM groups (as a whole) differ significantly"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.