Claims

Eighth graders taught with the Herrmann Whole Brain Teaching Method significantly outperformed conventionally taught peers on conceptual understanding of simple electric circuits

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After ANCOVA adjustment using pretest scores as covariate, HWBTM students scored significantly higher than CTM students on the conceptual test (means 10.96 vs 8.31 out of 14). → Ali Khalid Ali Bawaneh 2010

Evidence

Ali Khalid Ali Bawaneh 2010

Ali Khalid Ali Bawaneh, Ahmad Nurulazam Md Zain, & Salmiza Saleh. (2010). The Effect of Herrmann Whole Brain Teaching Method on Students' Understanding of Simple Electric Circuits. European Journal of Physics Education, Vol. 2 No. 2, ISSN 1309 7202. https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/13097202

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental 2x2 factorial study of 273 eighth graders in four Jordanian schools randomly assigned to HWBTM (n=135) or CTM (n=138); ANCOVA with pretest covariate gave F(1,270) = 114.72, P <.05, in favor of HWBTM, described as "The difference between the two means was 2.65."

"The mean of the HWBTM students' scores was 10.96; WKH PHDQ RI WKH &0 VWXGHQWV¶ scores was 8.31. The difference between the two means was 2.65."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.