Claims

The effect of CAME on mathematics achievement varies significantly by region of implementation (QB = 13.2191; p = .0162; I2 = 62.1759%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Region-level homogeneity testing shows statistically significant heterogeneity (QB = 13.2191; p = .0162), with region representing 62.1759% of total variability in effect sizes; no standardized effect size is printed for this moderator. → Demir 2014

Evidence

Demir 2014

Demir, S., & Başol, G. (2014). Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Mathematics Education (CAME) over Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(5), 2026-2035. http://www.edam.com.tr/estp

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis grouping the included studies by the region of Turkey where they were conducted. The article reports significant heterogeneity by region and that the maximum and minimum effect sizes were obtained in the Aegean and Mediterranean region groups, respectively; I2 was 62.1759%. No standardized effect size is printed for this contrast.

"the QB statistic, observed as a result of the homogeneity test of chi-square distribution calculated with a 0.05 confidence interval and five degrees of freedom(QB = 13.2191; p = .0162), reveals that the current study is statistically heterogeneous."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.