Claims

Geographical region does not significantly moderate the effect of constructivism on attitudes towards lessons

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across Turkey's seven principal geographical regions the between-group difference was not significant (Qb(6) = 10,524, p = 0,104). → Toraman 2016

Evidence

Toraman 2016

Toraman, C., & Demir, E. (2016). The effect of constructivism on attitudes towards lessons: A meta–analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 62, 115-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.62.8

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis across seven regions (Table 6): effect sizes ranged from 0,124 (Eastern Anatolia, non-significant) to 1,503 (Mediterranean); Central Anatolia had the most studies (15, ES = 1,008). The between-group test was non-significant.

"Table 6 shows that no heteregenity among the studies exists (Q (b) (6) = 10, 524, p>.05). In meta-analysis, geographical region is not considered a significant factor in the differentiation of studies."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.