Claims

Students most valued the caring, accountable relationship with their coach, reporting motivation, confidence, and accountability gains

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? When asked for the most useful outcome of coaching, participants' comments centered on relationship dynamics with a caring coach who held them accountable respectfully. → Parker 2010

Evidence

Parker 2010

Parker, D. R., Field Hoffman, S., Sawilowsky, S., & Rolands, L. (2010). An Examination of the Effects of ADHD Coaching on University Students' Executive Functioning. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(2), 115-132. https://www.edgefoundation.org

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Qualitative interview responses to the second research question about benefits of coaching services. Students described coaches as empathetic and knowledgeable about ADHD, and reported that being held accountable helped them progress rather than harming the relationship.

"Their comments overwhelmingly focused on helpful dynamics in their relationship with a caring coach. Some students spoke to qualities in the coach, such as being a skilled facilitator of the student's planning process, tailoring suggestions to that student's needs or preferences, holding students accountable in a respectful but consistent manner."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id caring-accountable-coach-relationship-benefits
title Students most valued the caring, accountable relationship with their coach, reporting motivation, confidence, and accountability gains
description Students most valued the caring, accountable relationship with their coach, reporting motivation, confidence, and accountability gains
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2010
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — parker-2010

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.