Claims

Students rated the cartoon condition as more enjoyable than bibliotherapy, though the difference was significant only at the alpha = 0.10 level

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students in the cartoon condition rated their liking of the lessons higher (mean 8.3, SD 2.4) than the bibliotherapy group (mean 7.0, SD 3.5) on a 10-point scale, a difference significant only at alpha = 0.10 (p = 0.08). → Zousel 2013

Evidence

Zousel 2013

Zousel, M. L., Rule, A. C., & Logan, S. R. (2013). Teaching Primary Grade Students Perfectionism through Cartoons Compared to Bibliotherapy. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 5(2), 199-218. www.iejee.com. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070469

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Student ratings of instructional condition were tabulated with means and standard deviations for the same 46-student two-condition experiment. The cartoon group's mean rating of 8.3 exceeded the control group's 7.0, but the t-test reached significance only at the alpha = 0.10 level (p = 0.08).

"Students in the control group responded with an average rating of 7.0 (Standard deviation = 3.5) out of 10, while students in the experimental group rated the lessons as 8.3 (s. d. = 2.4) out of 10. A t -test showed that the experimental group’s higher rating was statistically significant only at the alpha = 0.10 level ( p = 0.08)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.