Claims

Primary-grade students taught perfectionism concepts through cartoon analysis and production scored significantly higher on a posttest than students taught through bibliotherapy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 First- through third-grade students in the cartoon condition supplied significantly more correct posttest responses than the bibliotherapy control group, with a medium effect size (Cohen's d = 0.5). → Zousel 2013

Evidence

Zousel 2013

Zousel, M. L., Rule, A. C., & Logan, S. R. (2013). Teaching Primary Grade Students Perfectionism through Cartoons Compared to Bibliotherapy. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 5(2), 199-218. www.iejee.com. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070469

q2 · i1 · causal · r2

Pretest-posttest experimental group-control group study of 46 primary students in three grades at one suburban Iowa school, with intact classes randomly assigned to conditions. The experimental cartoon group scored significantly higher on the posttest (p = 0.02), and "The effect size, Cohen's d, was 0.5 indicating a medium effect size".

"However, students in the experimental condition supplied significantly more correct responses on the posttest than those in the control condition. A t -test was c onducted to determine if the higher posttest score for the experimental group were statistically significant. The p-value was 0.02"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.