Claims

Learners in immersive media environments tend to treat pedagogical agents as real people, relying primarily on biologically primary communication patterns

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r3 · q1
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Learners in immersive media environments tend to treat pedagogical agents as if they were real people, primarily relying on biologically primary communication patterns, so social interaction closely resembles real-life human-human interaction. → Ross 2026

Evidence

Ross 2026

Ross, M., & Kaspar, K. (2026). Learning with pedagogical agents in extended reality: A conceptual research-based framework of agent-centered learning in immersive media environments (ACLIME). PsyArXiv preprint. doi:10.31234/osf.io/e6smh_v1

q1 · i? · theoretical · r3

Conceptual conclusion of the review's section on similarity to real-life human-human interaction, grounded in the computers-are-social-actors paradigm (Nass & Moon, 2000) and the multimodal, body-based interactivity of XR; the review reports no new empirical data for this prediction.

"It can be concluded that learners in immersive media environments tend to treat pedagogical agents as if they were real people, primarily relying on biologically primary communication patterns."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id casa-primary-communication-immersive-agents
title Learners in immersive media environments tend to treat pedagogical agents as real people, relying primarily on biologically primary communication patterns
description Learners in immersive media environments tend to treat pedagogical agents as real people, relying primarily on biologically primary communication patterns
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
source_checked 2026-10-19
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ross-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.