Claims

Knowledge retained one month after CATM training, with post-test2 scores exceeding post-test1 in both periods

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Scores one month after training were higher than immediately after training, which the authors read as good knowledge retention. → Suleiman 2016

Evidence

Suleiman 2016

Abdulqadir Mohamad Suleiman. (2016). Concept Attainment Teaching Methodology (CATM) – An Effective Approach for Training Workers on Chemicals Health Hazards. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(11): 2677-2685. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.041122

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Conceptualized performance ratio (P-ratio) comparisons between repeated tests: 1.45 (45% improvement) in the first period and a 21% margin in the second period, described as "good knowledge retention". Descriptive ratios only; no effect size printed.

"Between Post-test 2 and 1 of the same period, P-ratio of 1.45 showing a score improvement by 45%, and good knowledge retention. For the second period, there was a twofold score improvement from Pre-test to Post-test1. The P-ratio for Post-test2 to Post-test1 shows also a 21% margin of improvement."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.