Claims

Consortium-wide, 35 percent of participants completed a grant-funded program of study, with high employment rates and wage growth above the national average

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-10-15 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Consortium-wide, 35 percent of participants completed a grant-funded program of study. → Person 2016 q2 i? Participants' employment rates started and remained high, and wages for employed participants increased after enrollment at a higher rate than the national average. → Person 2016

q2 i? Consortium-wide, 35% of participants completed their program. → Ann Person 2016

q2 i? Employment rates started and remained high, and wages for employed participants increased after program enrollment at a higher rate than the national average. → Ann Person 2016

q2 i? Consortium-wide, 35 percent of participants completed a grant-funded program of study. → Person 2016

q2 i? Participants' employment rates started and remained high, and wages for employed participants increased after program enrollment at a higher rate than the national average. → Person 2016

Evidence

Person 2016

Person, A. E., Thomas, J., & Goble, L. (2016). Implementation and Outcomes of Competency-Based Education in Three Community Colleges: Findings from the Comprehensive Evaluation of a TAACCCT Grant (Executive Summary). Oakland, CA: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/implementation-and-outcomes-of-competencybased-education-in-three-community-colleges-findings

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Evaluation of participant outcomes across the three-college consortium reports that "35 percent of participants completed a grant-funded program of study" and that wages for employed participants grew faster than the national average. No effect size is printed.

"Consortium-wide, 35 percent of participants completed a grant-funded program of study; their employment rates started and remained high, and wages for employed participants increased after program enrollment at a higher rate than the national average."

Ann Person 2016

Ann Person. (2016). Competency-Based Education in College Settings. Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/competency-based-education-in-focus

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Key findings of an evaluation of a community college CBE consortium under the Hand in Hand project, prepared for the U.S. Department of Labor. The brief reports that "35% of participants completed their program" and describes employment and wage trends relative to the national average; no effect size is printed.

"Consortium-wide, 35% of participants completed their program; their employment rates started and remained high, and wages for employed participants increased after program enrollment at a higher rate than the national average."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cbe-participants-completion-employment-wages
aliases cbe-consortium-35-percent-completion-high-employment-wage-growth, taaccct-cbe-35-percent-program-completion, taaccct-cbe-employment-wages-growth
title Consortium-wide, 35 percent of participants completed a grant-funded program of study, with high employment rates and wage growth above the national average
description Consortium-wide, 35 percent of participants completed a grant-funded program of study, with high employment rates and wage growth above the national average
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
source_checked 2026-10-15
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — person-2016, ann-person-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.