Case-based learning yielded the highest attitude mean score, significantly above conventional teaching, but the 7E-versus-CBL attitude difference was not significant¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Case-based learning (69.21) and 7E learning cycle (68.87) each differed significantly from conventional teaching (68.54) on attitude at p < .05. → Adesoji 2015
q2 i? The attitudinal difference between the 7E group (68.87) and the case-based group (69.21) was not significant. → Adesoji 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Adesoji 2015¶
Adesoji, F. A., & Idika, M. I. (2015). Effects of 7E learning cycle model and case-based learning strategy on secondary school students' learning outcomes in chemistry. Journal of International Society for Teacher Education, 19(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1177065
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Scheffé post-hoc tests of attitude by treatment; the article reports the case-based group (69.21) also differed significantly from the conventional group (68.54), and both experimental pairs contributed to the significant treatment effect.
"Table 7 shows a significant difference in the students' attitude scores in 7E learning cycle model strategy (x = 68.87) and conventional te aching strategy (x = 68.54)."
Adesoji 2015 (2)¶
Adesoji, F. A., & Idika, M. I. (2015). Effects of 7E learning cycle model and case-based learning strategy on secondary school students' learning outcomes in chemistry. Journal of International Society for Teacher Education, 19(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1177065
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Post-hoc analysis of attitude scores found the 7E-versus-case-based pair not significant; the article states this pair "did no t contribute to the significant effect of treatment obtained in Table 7." Equivalence was not tested.
"On the other hand, the attitudinal change between the 7E learning cycle model group (x = 68.87) and case -based learning group (x = 69.21) is not significant."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Case-based learning produced the highest chemistry achievement, followed by the 7E learning cycle model, with both exceeding conventional teaching (all pairwise differences significant) — related
- Treatment (7E learning cycle, case-based learning, or conventional teaching) has a significant main effect on senior secondary students' chemistry achievement — related
- Student preference for CBL, PBL or TBL over traditional teaching was reported in 15 of 22 studies (68.1%), but only two studies used a controlled comparison with lecture — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.