Claims

Student preference for CBL, PBL or TBL over traditional teaching was reported in 15 of 22 studies (68.1%), but only two studies used a controlled comparison with lecture

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In 15 studies (68.1%) students reported preferring active learning over conventional instruction, but this was derived retrospectively, and only two studies formally compared active learning with traditional lecture using a controlled design. → Mansoor Javeria 2026

Evidence

Mansoor Javeria 2026

Mansoor Javeria, Abdul Hameed Ameerali, Zaidi Tahani Waqar, Naeem Farhat Ul Ain, Mansoor Faareah, Bilal Muhammad, Kadir M Masood. (2026). Use of case-based, problem-based and team-based learning in public health education – a scoping review. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108317

q2 · i? · review · r2

Review synthesis of preference data across the 22 included studies; the preference finding was retrospective, drawn from rating scales, open-ended items or qualitative methods, with structured student feedback infrequently obtained.

"In 15 studies (68.1%), students reported a preference for CBL, PBL or TBL over conventional instruction; however, this finding was derived retrospectively through quantitative rating scales, open-ended items or qualitative methods"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.