Claims

The significant improvement replicated across two universities, State University of Malang and State University of Surabaya

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Significant increases occurred in both State University of Malang (Classes A and B) and State University of Surabaya (Classes C and D). → Sudibyo et al. 2016

Evidence

Sudibyo et al. 2016

Elok Sudibyo, Budi Jatmiko & Wahono Widodo. (2016). The Effectiveness of CBL Model to Improve Analytical Thinking Skills the Students of Sport Science. International Education Studies, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n4p195

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Replication design with two classes per university; the article states "increased significantly analytical thinking skills occured in both" universities. Figure 3 shows N-gain above 70% in each of the four classes, which the authors read as effective application in all classes.

"The Table 4 also informs that increased significantly analytical thinking skills occured in both State University of Malang (Class A and B) and State University of Surabaya (Class C and D)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.