Claims

A Context Based Learning physics model improves sport science students' analytical thinking skills with a high-category N-gain of 0.78

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After CBL implementation, sport science students' analytical thinking skills increased with an average N-gain of 0.78, categorized as high improvement. → Sudibyo et al. 2016

Evidence

Sudibyo et al. 2016

Elok Sudibyo, Budi Jatmiko & Wahono Widodo. (2016). The Effectiveness of CBL Model to Improve Analytical Thinking Skills the Students of Sport Science. International Education Studies, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n4p195

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pretest-posttest experimental study with replication across four classes at two universities, analyzed with Hake's N-gain. Pretest average was 8.27 and posttest 79.76; the article reports "N-Gain of 0.78 ar e included in the category of high increase". No standardized effect size is printed.

"The Table 2 describes that the average increase of student’s analytical thinking skills is 78% (score of N-Gain is 0.78). Based on the criteria according to Hake (1999), N-Gain of 0.78 ar e included in the category of high increase."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.