Claims

The authors report that CBPS enhanced prospective teachers' collaboration and motivation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors observed that CBPS group work fostered collaboration, mutual help and praise, and that technology as a cognitive tool supported collaboration, idea sharing and motivation; no quantitative measure is reported. → Yurniwati 2020

Evidence

Yurniwati 2020

Yurniwati, & Soleh, D. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of Computer-Based Problem Solving to Improve Higher Order Thinking Skills on Prospective Teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 393-406. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13227a

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' interpretation in the Discussion, citing Glazer (2001), that technology as a cognitive tool improved "collaboration, share ideas, motivation and social behaviour"; the abstract likewise reports enhanced collaboration and motivation. No instrument or statistic for these outcomes is printed.

"Moreover, technology as a cognitive tool was used to find information, make models and present solutions to improve collaboration, share ideas, motivation and social behaviour (Glazer, 2001)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.