Claims

The effect of computer-based teaching on academic success does not differ significantly by implementation period, with the largest effect size in the nine-to-eighteen week period (ES = 1.87)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? All six implementation-period groups had large effect sizes, with no significant difference among them (Z = 14.45, p > .05). → Veli Batdı 2015

Evidence

Veli Batdı 2015

Veli Batdı. (2015). A Meta-Analytic Study Concerning the Effect of Computer-Based Teaching on Academic Success in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.5.2491

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis of 78 studies across six implementation-period groups. Table 6 reports QB = 6.36, Z = 14.45, df = 5, homogeneous; total ES = 1.07.

"The largest effect-size value was found for the nine-to-eighteen week period (ES = 1.87), but in the five-to-six and seven-to-eight week periods, the effect sizes were determined to be .97 and .93, respectively."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.