Creative drama's effect on achievement does not significantly differ by implementation period (QB = 7.63, df = 4, p > .05), though the 9–18-week group showed the largest descriptive ES (2.55)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Across implementation-period groups (2–4, 5–6, 9–18 weeks, and unspecified), no significant between-group effect was found, although the 9–18-week group had the highest descriptive ES of 2.55 and the unspecified group the lowest (1.23). → Veli Batdı & Hacer Batdı 2015

Evidence¶

Veli Batdı & Hacer Batdı 2015¶

Veli Batdı & Hacer Batdı. (2015). Effect of Creative Drama on Academic Achievement: A Meta-analytic and Thematic Analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.6.0156

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analytic moderator analysis of implementation period across five groups: the 9–18-week group showed the highest descriptive ES (2.55) and unspecified the lowest (1.23), but no significant between-group difference (QB = 7.63, df = 4, p > .05).

"the lowest effect size of 1.23 was observed in the case of unspecified IP , whereas the highest effect size of 2.55 occurred in the 9–18-week-period group. However, a statistically significant difference in terms of the between- group effect ( QB = 7.63, df = 4, p > .05) was not found."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Creative drama's effect on achievement does not significantly differ by grade level (QB = 3.75, df = 4, p > .05) — related
• Effect size of creative drama on skills varies significantly with duration of experimental application, with longer applications showing larger effects — related
• The effect of drama on social studies achievement does not differ significantly by duration of application (1–4 vs 5–10 weeks) — related
• Creative drama's effect on achievement does not significantly differ by subject field (p > .05), though the English-lesson effect size (ES = 3.37) was descriptively highest — related
• The effect of games on mathematics achievement does not differ significantly by implementation period — related
• The effect of cooperative learning on mathematics achievement does not differ significantly by implementation period — related
• The effect of computer-based teaching on academic success does not differ significantly by implementation period, with the largest effect size in the nine-to-eighteen week period (ES = 1.87) — related
• SEM intervention periods of no more than 18 sessions are effective; periods of 18 or more sessions show no significant effect — related